Why we chose $99 or Enterprise.

The five-tier pricing ladder isn't a pricing strategy. It's a sales playbook. Here's why we cut the ladder, with data from the AEO category we studied.

Founder post · April 17, 2026 · ~7 min read

Here's the screen I stared at for a week before we set pricing:

ToolStarterMidReal tierEnterprise
Profound$99$399$2,000-5,000+
Scrunch$250$500+Custom
AthenaHQ$95$295Custom
Peec AI$100$200Custom
Ahrefs Brand Radar$199/mo + $129+ base Ahrefs = $328+/mo floorBundled
Semrush AI Visibility$99+$60/50 prompts+$99/seat/domainEnterprise

Six tools. Six ladders. Every one of them built to do the same thing.

The pricing ladder is not a pricing strategy. It's a sales playbook designed to extract more ACV from the same buyer.

I kept coming back to Profound's ladder specifically. $99 → $399 → $2,000+. The $99 tier is functionally a funnel — you hit the prompt limit in week two and upgrade. The $399 tier is where the real product starts. The enterprise tier is the number they actually want to sell. If you buy in at $99 and you're serious, you end up at $399 inside sixty days. That's not serving the customer. That's a sequenced extraction.

I get why. Every growth playbook in B2B SaaS in the last ten years said build a land-and-expand motion, price to a low anchor, create a natural upgrade pressure, capture the willingness-to-pay as the account matures. It works. It's how the category got here. But I kept asking myself a simple question:

If the customer knew the ladder existed before they bought, would they feel served or managed?

I think the honest answer is: managed.

What $99 covers at Lantern

We priced the thing a B2B SaaS CMO actually needs at $99/mo. Not a funnel tier. The real tier.

If a B2B SaaS CMO between 50 and 500 employees can't do their job on that, I built the wrong product. Prompt-coverage expansion, multi-brand reporting, Salesforce, SOC 2, DPA, custom SLA — that's Enterprise. Everything else is $99.

The reason this works mathematically: a 200-prompt ceiling covers the 7-12 working prompts that actually drive pipeline in almost every B2B SaaS category we've seen, with ~15x headroom for monitoring and experimentation. We're not pricing scarcity. We're pricing the real shape of the job.

What Enterprise covers

Enterprise is the call-us tier. Not because we want you to call us for ego reasons — because the companies that need enterprise actually need a conversation. Multi-brand rollouts. Salesforce deployments where RevOps wants to co-architect the custom object schema. SOC 2 Type II reviews. DPA negotiation. Procurement cycles that run 45-60 days. These deals are not $99/mo deals and pretending they are would be dishonest.

Enterprise covers:

One price for everything below Enterprise. One conversation for everything above it.

The objection I heard the most

When I floated this pricing with investors and advisors, the single most common objection was: "You're leaving money on the table. Customers who'd pay $299 or $499 will just pay $99."

Correct. And I'm fine with that.

The reason I'm fine with it is that I believe the ladder creates a specific failure mode I don't want. A customer on the $99 tier who feels successful is going to tell five peers. A customer on the $99 tier who gets throttled into upgrading because I built the tier to be insufficient is going to feel extracted, and extraction doesn't compound into referrals.

Referral flywheel beats ACV extraction at the seed-to-Series-A stage. You can optimize the second one later. You can't buy back the first one.

There's a second reason, which is more specific to our category. The AEO space is actively consolidating. Martech is under cost-cutting pressure — 39% of CMOs are cutting agencies, 22% of marketing budget (martech) is the explicit target. The only sustainable posture in that environment is clarity. "$99/mo for what we do, Enterprise for what we'd build for you" is clarity. "$99/$199/$399/$999/Enterprise" is the opposite of clarity, and buyers know it when they see it.

What we're not doing

Three common SaaS pricing moves we're skipping on purpose:

What I'll revisit

I'm writing this in public partly to commit to it, partly because I know the honest answer is "we'll see how this holds up."

Three scenarios that would force a revisit:

  1. If a category-specific need emerges that doesn't fit $99 or Enterprise cleanly (specialized use cases, industry-specific needs, or compliance requirements that sit between the two tiers).
  2. If heavy users on $99 create a meaningful infrastructure cost problem — prompts and engine calls have a real unit cost and the 200-prompt ceiling exists partly for that reason.
  3. If buyers tell us with money that $99 doesn't signal enough value. I don't expect this, but I'll listen.

If any of those happen, I'd rather revisit publicly than quietly add tiers.

For now: $99/mo or Enterprise. One price or call us.

A
Amogh Reddy
Founder, Lantern

$99/mo or Enterprise. No ladder.

Lantern ships HubSpot-native AEO pipeline attribution. $99 for everything below Enterprise, one conversation for everything above it. 10 V1 design-partner spots open.

Join Waitlist